FXJ Wiki

Back

When Problem-Setting Syndrome Strikes, Start with the Strange Core
16 min read
English algorithm / problem setting / problem design / thinking

When Problem-Setting Syndrome Strikes, Start with the Strange Core

Based on the original "Problem-Setting Syndrome Struck" notes, preserving the "Magic Bag" problem, derivation, code, and extension directions.
views | comments

Content Covered#

  • Problem-Setting Syndrome Struck

Original Problem-Setting Notes Organization#

Putting Coins Twice Becomes Three Times#

According to the description and solution process in the story, the operating mechanism of the magic bag can be modeled through mathematical functions. Define function f(x)f(x) to represent the number of coins taken out after putting xx coins into the bag. The key condition is: for any initial quantity yy, after putting yy coins into the bag and taking out f(y)f(y), then putting f(y)f(y) coins into the bag, the quantity taken out should be f(f(y))=3yf(f(y)) = 3y. At the same time, function ff is strictly increasing (i.e., if x1<x2x_1 < x_2, then f(x1)<f(x2)f(x_1) < f(x_2)), and the number of coins must be integers.

In the story, the values of f(x)f(x) are gradually derived by constructing a sequence, starting from small xx, ensuring that the conditions f(f(y))=3yf(f(y)) = 3y and strict increase are satisfied. The following are the core steps of the derivation process:

  • Starting from y=1y = 1: Put 1 coin into the bag, take out f(1)f(1); then put f(1)f(1) into the bag, take out f(f(1))=3×1=3f(f(1)) = 3 \times 1 = 3. Since magic increases coins and coins are integers, f(1)>1f(1) > 1 and f(f(1))=3>f(1)f(f(1)) = 3 > f(1), so the only possibility is f(1)=2f(1) = 2, and thus f(2)=3f(2) = 3.
  • For y=2y = 2: Put 2 coins into the bag, take out f(2)=3f(2) = 3; then put 3 into the bag, take out f(f(2))=f(3)=3×2=6f(f(2)) = f(3) = 3 \times 2 = 6, so f(3)=6f(3) = 6.
  • For y=3y = 3: Put 3 coins into the bag, take out f(3)=6f(3) = 6; then put 6 into the bag, take out f(f(3))=f(6)=3×3=9f(f(3)) = f(6) = 3 \times 3 = 9, so f(6)=9f(6) = 9.
  • For y=4y = 4: Put 4 coins into the bag, take out f(4)f(4); then put f(4)f(4) into the bag, take out f(f(4))=3×4=12f(f(4)) = 3 \times 4 = 12. Since ff is strictly increasing, and f(3)=6f(3) = 6 and f(6)=9f(6) = 9, we have 6<f(4)<96 < f(4) < 9 (because 3<4<63 < 4 < 6), so f(4)=7f(4) = 7 or 88. Similarly, for y=5y = 5, f(5)f(5) satisfies f(4)<f(5)<f(6)=9f(4) < f(5) < f(6) = 9. By ensuring sequence consistency, we get f(4)=7f(4) = 7 and f(5)=8f(5) = 8, and thus f(7)=12f(7) = 12 (because f(f(4))=f(7)=12f(f(4)) = f(7) = 12).
  • Similarly, derive more values: f(8)=15f(8) = 15, f(9)=18f(9) = 18, etc.

By gradually constructing the sequence, we get the function value table as follows (partial key values):

Input xxOutput f(x)f(x)
12
23
36
47
58
69
712
815
918
1019
1120
1221
1322
1423
1524

For x=13x = 13:

  • Since ff is strictly increasing, and f(12)=21f(12) = 21 and f(15)=24f(15) = 24 (because when y=5y = 5, f(f(5))=f(8)=15f(f(5)) = f(8) = 15, and thus when y=8y = 8, f(f(8))=f(15)=24f(f(8)) = f(15) = 24), we have 21<f(13)<2421 < f(13) < 24, so f(13)=22f(13) = 22 or 2323.
  • If f(13)=22f(13) = 22, then f(14)=23f(14) = 23 (because f(13)<f(14)<f(15)=24f(13) < f(14) < f(15) = 24), and f(f(13))=f(22)=39f(f(13)) = f(22) = 39 (because when y=13y = 13, f(f(13))=3×13=39f(f(13)) = 3 \times 13 = 39).
  • If f(13)=23f(13) = 23, then f(14)f(14) cannot be an integer (because f(13)=23<f(14)<24f(13) = 23 < f(14) < 24, no integer solution), contradiction.
  • Therefore, the only possibility is f(13)=22f(13) = 22.

In the story, after the old man puts 13 coins into the bag and takes out coins, the number of coins in his hand is f(13)=22f(13) = 22. So, guess that he has 22 coins in his hand.

Problem: Magic Bag#

Problem Description#

There is a magic bag. When you put coins into the bag, the bag will cast magic, causing the number of coins taken out to change. The magic of the bag satisfies the following rules:

  1. The function f(x)f(x) implemented by the bag is strictly increasing: if x1<x2x_1 < x_2, then f(x1)<f(x2)f(x_1) < f(x_2).
  2. The magic of the bag has a composite effect: f(f(x))=3xf(f(x)) = 3x (i.e., after putting xx coins in and taking out f(x)f(x) coins, putting f(x)f(x) coins in again will take out 3x3x coins).
  3. It is known that f(1)=2f(1) = 2.

Given integer nn (1n1061 \leq n \leq 10^6), find the value of f(n)f(n).

Input Format#

One integer nn.

Output Format#

One integer, representing the value of f(n)f(n).

Example#

Input:
13
Output:
22

Data Range#
  • For 30% of the data, n1000n \leq 1000
  • For 100% of the data, n106n \leq 10^6
Algorithm Approach#
  1. Function properties: f(f(x))=3xf(f(x)) = 3x and ff is strictly increasing, f(1)=2f(1) = 2.
  2. Dynamic construction: Calculate f(x)f(x) in order from x=1x = 1 to nn:
    • Case 1: If xx is a function value from a previous calculation (i.e., x=f(y)x = f(y)), then f(x)=3yf(x) = 3y.
    • Case 2: Otherwise, assign the smallest available integer vv greater than the current maximum function value and greater than xx as f(x)f(x).
  3. Maintain information:
    • f[x]: Store function values.
    • origin[v]: Record which xx produced vv (i.e., v=f(x)v = f(x)).
    • used[v]: Mark whether vv has been used as a function value.
    • Dynamically update the current maximum function value max_f and the next available integer next_avail.
C++ Code Implementation#
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;

const int maxN = 1000000;   // Maximum value of input n
const int maxV = 3000000;   // Maximum possible range of function values

int f[maxN + 10];           // f[x] stores function values
int origin[maxV + 10];      // origin[v] = x means v is produced by x
bool used[maxV + 10];       // used[v] marks whether v has been used

int main() {
    int n;
    cin >> n;

    // Initialize
    for (int i = 1; i <= maxV; i++) {
        used[i] = false;
        origin[i] = 0;
    }
    for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
        f[i] = 0;
    }

    long long max_f = 0;    // Current maximum function value
    long long next_avail = 1; // Next available integer

    for (int x = 1; x <= n; x++) {
        if (f[x] != 0) continue;  // Skip if already calculated

        if (origin[x] != 0) {
            // Case 1: x is a function value from a previous calculation
            int y = origin[x];
            long long val = 3 * (long long)y;
            f[x] = val;
            max_f = max(max_f, val);  // Update maximum function value

            if (val <= maxV) {
                used[val] = true;     // Mark this function value as used
            }
        } else {
            // Case 2: Assign new function value
            long long v0 = max(max_f + 1, (long long)x + 1);
            long long v = next_avail;
            if (v < v0) v = v0;

            // Find the first unused v
            while (v <= maxV && used[v]) {
                v++;
            }
            if (v > maxV) {
                cerr << "No valid solution!" << endl;
                return 1;
            }

            f[x] = v;
            used[v] = true;
            max_f = max(max_f, v);    // Update maximum function value
            next_avail = v + 1;       // Update next available integer
        }

        // Set origin: record that f[x] is produced by x
        if (f[x] <= maxV) {
            origin[f[x]] = x;
        }
    }

    cout << f[n] << endl;
    return 0;
}
cpp
Complexity Analysis#
  • Time complexity: O(n+maxV)O(n + \text{maxV}), where maxV=3×106\text{maxV} = 3 \times 10^6. Loop nn times, each operation is constant or linear time (in the free allocation branch, searching for available integers, but amortized cost is low).
  • Space complexity: O(maxV)O(\text{maxV}), mainly determined by the origin and used arrays.
Problem Extension Directions#
  1. Larger data range: When n107n \leq 10^7, need to optimize the search efficiency of the used array (can use balanced tree or skip list).
  2. Query multiple values: Query f(ni)f(n_i) multiple times, can preprocess the entire function table.
  3. Inverse function solving: Given kk, find the solution xx of f(x)=kf(x) = k.
  4. Function property proof: Require proof of uniqueness or specific mathematical properties of ff.

This problem cleverly transforms the logic in the story into a function construction problem, combining mathematical reasoning and algorithm design, suitable as a programming competition or algorithm training problem.

V1#

Directly give a certain form, output a certain formatted form according to the format (sign-in problem)

V2#

If coins can be torn (i.e., can be described as a non-integer geometric sequence), touching coins twice can become three times the original, then given a number of coins, output the number of coins (sign-in problem)

V3#

This is the current problem. If coins can only appear as integers, touching coins twice can become three times the original, then given an integer, how many coins will it become after touching once?

V4#

Extensions#

1. Mathematical Properties and Closed-Form Formula#

Extension direction: Explore the mathematical properties of function ff, derive closed-form expression Core properties:

  • f(f(x))=3xf(f(x)) = 3x
  • f(3kx)=3kf(x)f(3^k \cdot x) = 3^k \cdot f(x) (numbers divisible by 3 can be recursively decomposed)
  • Function values are linearly grouped within the interval [3k,3k+1)[3^k, 3^{k+1})

Derivation process:

  1. Orbit decomposition: Each orbit consists of a seed number ss (not divisible by 3) and a sequence:

    sf(s)3sf(3s)9ss \rightarrow f(s) \rightarrow 3s \rightarrow f(3s) \rightarrow 9s \rightarrow \cdots

    For example, the orbit of seed number 1: 12369181 \rightarrow 2 \rightarrow 3 \rightarrow 6 \rightarrow 9 \rightarrow 18 \rightarrow \cdots

  2. Function value distribution:

    • Within interval [3k,23k)[3^k, 2\cdot3^k): f(x)=x+3kf(x) = x + 3^k
    • Within interval [23k,3k+1)[2\cdot3^k, 3^{k+1}): f(x)=3x3k+1f(x) = 3x - 3^{k+1}
  3. Closed-form expression:

    f(x)={x+3kif 3kx<23k3x3k+1if 23kx<3k+1f(x) = \begin{cases} x + 3^k & \text{if } 3^k \leq x < 2\cdot3^k \\ 3x - 3^{k+1} & \text{if } 2\cdot3^k \leq x < 3^{k+1} \end{cases}

    where k=log3xk = \lfloor \log_3 x \rfloor

Example verification:

  • x=4x=4: k=1k=1, 314<63^1 \leq 4 < 6f(4)=4+3=7f(4)=4+3=7
  • x=7x=7: k=1k=1, 67<96 \leq 7 < 9f(7)=3×79=12f(7)=3\times7-9=12
2. Efficient Algorithm Optimization#

Extension direction: Handle large-scale data with n107n \leq 10^7 Optimization strategies:

  1. Grouped calculation: Directly calculate function values using interval characteristics

    int f(int x) {
        if (x == 1) return 2;
        int k = 0, temp = x;
        while (temp % 3 == 0) { k++; temp /= 3; }
        if (k > 0) return pow(3, k) * f(temp);
        
        int exp = 0;
        while (pow(3, exp + 1) <= x) exp++;
        int lower = pow(3, exp);
        
        if (x < 2 * lower) return x + lower;
        return 3 * x - 3 * pow(3, exp + 1);
    }
    cpp
  2. Preprocessing technique:

    • Block preprocessing: Every 10610^6 as a group, store interval boundary values
    • Binary search: Quickly locate the interval where xx is located

Complexity:

  • Time complexity: O(1)O(1) per query (after preprocessing)
  • Space complexity: O(logn)O(\log n)
3. Inverse Function Solving#

Extension direction: Given kk, find the solution xx of f(x)=kf(x) = k Mathematical derivation:

  1. Determine the interval [3m,3m+1)[3^m, 3^{m+1}) where kk is located
  2. Solve in two cases: x={k3mif 3mk<23mk+3m+13if 23mk<3m+1x = \begin{cases} k - 3^m & \text{if } 3^m \leq k < 2\cdot3^m \\ \frac{k + 3^{m+1}}{3} & \text{if } 2\cdot3^m \leq k < 3^{m+1} \end{cases}

Algorithm implementation:

int inverse_f(int k) {
    if (k == 2) return 1;
    int m = 0;
    while (pow(3, m + 1) <= k) m++;
    int lower = pow(3, m);
    
    if (k < 2 * lower) return k - lower;
    if ((k + pow(3, m + 1)) % 3 != 0) return -1; // No solution
    return (k + pow(3, m + 1)) / 3;
}
cpp
4. Dynamic Version Maintenance#

Extension direction: Support dynamic function modification and queries Operation types:

  1. Modification operation: Update function value at a specific point
  2. Query operation: Find f(k)(x)f^{(k)}(x) (kk-th composite function)
  3. Range query: Find i=lrf(i)\sum_{i=l}^r f(i)

Data structures:

  • Segment tree + lazy propagation: Maintain function value range sum
  • Skip list index: Accelerate composite function queries
  • Version control: Use persistent data structures to support historical queries

Core operations:

class DynamicF {
    struct Node {
        int l, r, sum, lazy;
    } tree[4 * MAXN];
    
    void build(int id, int l, int r) {
        // Initialize segment tree
    }
    
    void update(int id, int pos, int val) {
        // Update single point function value
    }
    
    int query_composite(int x, int k) {
        // Query f^{(k)}(x)
        while (k > 0) {
            x = f(x); // Optimize using skip list
            k--;
        }
        return x;
    }
};
cpp
5. Multi-dimensional Extension#

Extension direction: Extend the problem to higher dimensions Problem definition:

  • Define dd-dimensional function f:ZdZdf: \mathbb{Z}^d \to \mathbb{Z}^d
  • Satisfies f(m)(x1,,xd)=(a1x1,,adxd)f^{(m)}(x_1, \dots, x_d) = (a_1x_1, \dots, a_dx_d)
  • Constraint: i=1dai=3m\prod_{i=1}^d a_i = 3^m

Solution approach:

  1. Coordinate separation: Solve each dimension independently
  2. Tensor decomposition: Handle correlations between dimensions f(x)=i=1dfi(xi)f(\mathbf{x}) = \bigotimes_{i=1}^d f_i(x_i)
  3. Grid optimization: Use KD-Tree to accelerate multi-dimensional queries
6. Function Property Proof#

Extension direction: Prove existence and uniqueness of the function Proof framework:

  1. Existence proof (constructive):

    • Base function: f(1)=2f(1)=2
    • Recursive definition: f(x)={3f(x/3)x0(mod3)smallest available integerotherwisef(x) = \begin{cases} 3f(x/3) & x \equiv 0 \pmod{3} \\ \text{smallest available integer} & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}
  2. Uniqueness proof:

    • Assume there exist f1f2f_1 \neq f_2 satisfying the conditions
    • Take the smallest difference point x0=min{xf1(x)f2(x)}x_0 = \min\{x \mid f_1(x) \neq f_2(x)\}
    • Derive contradiction: f1(f1(x0))=3x0=f2(f2(x0))f_1(f_1(x_0)) = 3x_0 = f_2(f_2(x_0))
  3. Monotonicity proof:

    • Prove by induction x1<x2,f(x1)<f(x2)\forall x_1 < x_2, f(x_1) < f(x_2)
    • Key step: Compare function values when crossing intervals

Extended Problem Example (ACM Style)#

Problem: The Mystery of the Magic Bag#

Problem Description
The king’s magic bag satisfies strange rules: after putting xx coins into the bag, you get f(x)f(x) coins. Function ff satisfies:

  1. f(f(x))=3xf(f(x)) = 3x
  2. f(3x)=3f(x)f(3x) = 3f(x)
  3. ff is strictly increasing
  4. f(1)=2f(1) = 2

You need to handle three types of operations:

  1. 1 x: Query the value of f(x)f(x)
  2. 2 x k: Query f(k)(x)f^{(k)}(x) (kk-th composite function)
  3. 3 l r: Calculate i=lrf(i)\sum_{i=l}^r f(i)

Input Format
The first line contains the number of operations qq and maximum range nn
The next qq lines, each line is an operation

Output Format
Output the result for each query

Data Range

  • 1q1051 \leq q \leq 10^5
  • 1n1071 \leq n \leq 10^7
  • 1x,k,l,rn1 \leq x, k, l, r \leq n

Sample Input

3 20
1 13
2 4 2
3 1 5
plaintext

Sample Output

22
12
36
plaintext

Sample Explanation:

  • f(13)=22f(13) = 22
  • f(2)(4)=f(f(4))=f(7)=12f^{(2)}(4) = f(f(4)) = f(7) = 12
  • i=15f(i)=f(1)++f(5)=2+3+6+7+8=26\sum_{i=1}^5 f(i) = f(1)+\dots+f(5) = 2+3+6+7+8=26

Summary#

Through extensions from multiple dimensions such as mathematical properties, algorithm optimization, dynamic maintenance, and multi-dimensional extension, the original interesting story can be developed into an algorithm competition problem with depth. Key extension points include:

  1. Mathematical essence: Reveal the closed-form expression and orbit decomposition characteristics of the function
  2. Efficient algorithms: Use interval characteristics to achieve O(1)O(1) queries
  3. Dynamic version: Support real-time modification and complex queries
  4. Multi-dimensional extension: Generalize the problem to high-dimensional space
  5. Rigorous proof: Train mathematical reasoning ability

These extensions both maintain the interest of the original problem and increase the depth and challenge of the algorithm, suitable as advanced algorithm competition problems.

When Problem-Setting Syndrome Strikes, Start with the Strange Core
https://fxj.wiki/en/blog/algorithm-question-design
Author 玛卡巴卡
Published at 2025年6月1日
Comment seems to stuck. Try to refresh?✨